Boy, this post apparently touched a sensitive nerve:  The scariest pricing idea ever.  That works.

The notion (even the possibility) of allowing clients to decide how much to pay got a lot of people commenting, retweeting, forwarding and linking. Very intriguing.

Some 100 or so readers offered perceptive comments here (thank you for chiming in).

The post also prompted this discussion at yCombinator’s Hacker News. Lots of pro and con, back and forth, including some perspectives that I hadn’t heard before, which will be woven into this section in the upcoming Talking Money.

Oh, and notice that the highest-rated comment in the Hacker News thread was this first-hand story. Purely human, and not about money at all.

The grossly oversimpified summary:

Freelancers who seem to like their clients were intrigued by the idea. They were more willing (at least in principle) to submit themselves now and then to a ‘value judgment’ on their skills. They wondered if they would be pleasantly surprised.

Freelancers who have wary and contentious relationships with their clients hated the idea. They figured they would only get screwed by their clueless, cheap-ass clients. Which is understandable.

Although (trust me on this) mutual suspicion is a painful and unprofitable business model. There is MUCH more money in relationships where you and the client sit on the same side of the desk, trying to do amazing things.

If you are both circling each other like two wrestlers in a ring, you both lose.

And, one of the most unexpected comments to the post, from Thorbjørn in Denmark:

Drunk customers pay more in Denmark

“Me and a few others are running bike taxis and we also sometimes tell people pay what you want. . .

“Usually the drunk people will give a lot more (although they usually tip pretty good too when you give them a quote)

“The people who just hop on without asking for a price first are usually the most generous.”

Bookmark and Share